TWISTS AND TURNS OF MOTION SIMULATOR RIDE REPLICATED
USING NEW ACTUATOR SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY
 |
Iwerks Entertainment, Inc., Burbank, California, is
one of the world’s leading suppliers of location-based entertainment
attractions, such as the TurboRide cinematic simulator shown
here. This type of simulator was the subject of an engineering
analysis by amusement ride expert Ed Pribonic using Mechanical
Event Simulation software from ALGOR, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. |
By: Edward M. Pribonic
President, Edward M. Pribonic P.E. Engineering and Consulting,
Seal Beach, California, www.aimsintl.org/pribonic.htm
As an engineering consultant specializing in amusement rides,
theme park design and water parks, my job often seems more like
play than work. I have worked on countless theme park simulations
-- flight, free-fall, explosions, train rides and space travel,
just to name a few. While it is fun and exciting, engineering
in the entertainment industry is also a very serious business.
Millions of people take tens of millions of thrill rides each
year in amusement parks. Assuring their safety as they roar through
the loops of a roller coaster at 60 mph, or as they dive and dodge
exploding asteroids in a flight simulator, is a demanding engineering
responsibility.
Fortunately, rapid advances in science and computer technologies,
especially simulation software, now support engineering analysis.
However, for slide rule-trained engineers like myself, realizing
the benefits of the latest simulation tools can require some extra
time and training. My efforts paid off recently when my firm created
an engineering simulation using physics-based Mechanical Event
Simulation (MES) software from ALGOR, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
to verify the integrity of a cinematic motion simulator ride.
A family entertainment complex in Edinburgh, Scotland, purchased
a new TurboRide from Iwerks Entertainment, Inc. (Iwerks), headquartered
in Burbank, California. Iwerks contracted Edward M. Pribonic P.E.
Engineering and Consulting (Pribonic Engineering and Consulting)
to verify that the American-built simulator would meet requirements
set by the British Fairground Standard for amusement ride safety.
After recognizing the inherent limitations of using traditional
linear static stress analysis to analyze a dynamic event, my firm
researched alternative FEA and kinematic analysis solutions and
concluded that MES provided the best solution for the engineering
analysis needs of the project. Ultimately, the MES enabled the
installation of the ride to move forward and provided my client
with a virtual prototype for future product developments.
The Dilemma
The Iwerks TurboRide consists of two, four or eight seats mounted
on motion bases that are arranged before giant flat or domed 180?theater
screens. The motion bases move in synchronization with action-packed
Point of View movies. The large screens, coordinated movement
and booming digital audio transport riders through the virtual twists
and turns of a space voyage, whisk them through the human body or
race them across the finish line of an Indy Car-type race.
The Edinburgh installation consists of 12 four-seat motion bases.
The fiberglass seats are supported by a welded steel frame of
rectangular tubing, known as the flying platform. Six double-acting
hydraulic cylinders connect the flying platform and floor-mounted
base unit. Each cylinder is fastened at one end to the
base unit via a cast iron bearing.
The base unit has three mounting plates, each with two bearings
to accept the lower ends of the cylinders. The computer-controlled
hydraulic cylinders extend or retract independently, providing
the seat and occupants roll, pitch, yaw, heave, surge and sway
motion with six degrees of freedom in coordination with the on-screen
adventure action.
After reviewing the simulator design, Iwerks, their client and
I determined that all components of the ride should be structurally
analyzed with the bearings as the main focus of the engineering
analysis. We needed to verify that the simulators would safely
withstand the dynamic loading caused by the actuating cylinders,
the weight of the entire assembly and presence of four adult passengers.
Of special concern was a portion of the iron bearing housing beneath
the bearing inserts. We needed to prove that there was no possibility
of a catastrophic failure of this part.
 |
Cast iron bearings, similar to this one, were the focus
of the linear static stress analysis, which aimed to verify
that the bearings could withstand stresses resulting from
the motion of six actuating hydraulic cylinders and provide
extended service life. |
While the goal of the project was straightforward, the method
of achieving it was not. Our first approach to the problem was
to perform a linear static stress analysis. However, we discovered
that the inherent limitations of static analysis made it unsuitable
for studying the dynamic nature of the simulator. The problem
arose in determining loads created by the accelerations of the
multiple double-acting cylinders to use as input into a linear
static stress analysis.
Control valves connect to the top and bottom of each cylinder.
As the ride begins, computerized controls lift all six cylinders
to their neutral positions at half the cylinder extension capability
(maximum extension is 25.25 inches) by raising fluid levels in
the lower portion and releasing fluid in the upper portion of
the cylinder. Computer commands conduct unique multi-directional
extension and retraction sequences for each of the cylinders.
An accumulator provides for fluid surges, while a central HPU
provides a constant fluid pressure of 2000 PSI.
Due to the complexity of movement, calculating the loading on
the bearings from the six independently moving cylinders was not
feasible. A detailed solid model of the bearing was created in
SolidWorks and captured directly in ALGOR using InCADPlus
for SolidWorks, without translation to a neutral file format.
The model was fully constrained at the stainless steel inset in
the center of the bearing. We decided to analyze a worst case
scenario, applying an artificially high static load to the bearing.
In addition to the bearing analysis, Iwerks requested another
analysis to verify that the welds of the motion base also would
withstand the dynamic loads created by actuator
movement and the presence of simulated passengers. A detailed
solid model of the motion base was created in SolidWorks and transferred
to ALGOR in the same manner as the previous model. A load that
would have been distributed to three mounting plates was applied
to just one mounting plate in the vertical and horizontal directions.
The points where the seat is attached to the frame were fully
fixed for the static analysis. The results showed only moderate
stress levels in the structure despite an artificially high load
case. The welds in the seat frame performed well under the applied
loads.
 |
The linear static stress analysis results showed that
a bearing could withstand loading 2.5 times the maximum-recommended
load for the component. Because of the number of assumptions
and simplifications made in the analysis, Mr. Pribonic was
not convinced that the results portrayed an accurate picture
of the mechanical system behavior. |
The static analyses conducted separately on the bearings and
seat frame yielded low to moderate stresses as well. While the
results were favorable, both my firm and our client were not convinced
that the results portrayed an accurate picture of the mechanical
system behavior because of the number of assumptions and simplifications
made in the static analysis.
Consequently, my firm decided to go beyond
traditional static FEA methods to take advantage of the high level
of engineering simulation and computing power available with ALGOR.
I recommended that we build a complete, fully detailed, full-motion
computer model of the simulator that could be used to run the
motion profile at hand as well as new motion profiles as they
are developed for future films. Stresses on the equipment can
change with every new motion profile so Iwerks needed an engineering
model that could run each motion profile and produce results.
With the help of ALGOR’s technical support, we determined that
replicating the actuating movement of the hydraulic cylinders
using ALGOR’s new actuator element technology and Mechanical Event
Simulation (MES) software was the best method of evaluating real
dynamic loads over time. In addition, a reliable computer model
based on a detailed CAD solid assembly would help all involved
to better understand the dynamics of the design and apply this
knowledge to future programming and simulator design decisions.
The Solution
At the onset of the MES, the dynamic load calculation problems encountered
in the linear static stress analyses were eliminated. MES simulates
motion and flexing simultaneously to calculate stresses over time,
thus forces are determined intrinsically by the software. MES is
physics-based, not assumptions-based; therefore, we could rely on
the "known" physics of the event -- the weight of the simulator
and passengers, gravity, pressure and displacement of each cylinder
over time -- to unfold as the event was processed. Using this data,
Pribonic Engineering and Consulting was challenged to simulate the
six degrees of freedom motion capability of the simulator ride in
order to determine dynamic stresses in
the bearings.
For a simple MES, such as a manually shifted lever, the engineer
simply specifies a prescribed displacement or, if it is known,
the force needed to set up the MES. Then the software will compute
the acceleration and resulting stresses. In the case of the simulator,
applying prescribed displacements for each cylinder to get dynamic
motion and stress results over time was not feasible. At best,
we could determine stresses at just one instant in time if we
used this approach with the available software capabilities. Such
an analysis would yield a similar result as a motion load transfer
analysis, in which loading determined in a kinematic analysis
is applied to a static stress analysis. My client had already
agreed that this would not meet the safety analysis requirements
for the project.
The complex actuating movement could be simulated using a new
actuator element technology invented by ALGOR. Actuator elements
are engineering elements (like contact or dashpot elements) that
replicate linear extension and contraction movement in three-dimensional
space, typical motion for hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders and
electric solenoids. An actuator element, which appears as a line,
was used to represent each cylinder in the finite element model.
To proceed with the MES, we created a detailed CAD assembly of
the simulator that would be captured in ALGOR for finite element
modeling. Using SolidWorks once again, engineers at Pribonic Engineering
and Consulting modeled more than 100 individual components based
on Iwerks drawings and merged the components into five subassemblies.
|
|
To create an accurate representation of the simulator,
a SolidWorks assembly was created and captured in ALGOR using
InCADPlus technology. The hydraulic cylinders were
represented with ALGOR’s actuator elements. The inset shows
the construction of the base unit with three mounting plates
containing pairs of bearings. The center bracket holds the
accumulator, which handles fluid demand peaks. Hydraulic pressure
for the system is provided by a central HPU at a constant
2000 PSI. |
The surfaces of the subassemblies were meshed separately by choosing
the InCADPlus menu selection in SolidWorks,
which activates ALGOR’s surface meshing. InCADPlus captures
the exact CAD geometry, and group information is preserved in
the finite element model.
Once the subassemblies were meshed, they were merged into one
model in Superdraw III. While some detailed surface matching was
needed to align welded components in the seat frame, we performed
very little surface mesh enhancement. The initial finite element
model contained approximately 500,000 elements -- far too many
for a reasonable analysis processing time.
With the help of ALGOR’s technical support, my firm was able
to reduce the overall number of finite elements in the model to
approximately 141,000 elements. This was due in part to ALGOR’s
solid mesh engine, which automatically creates better aspect ratios
for each solid element based on the quality level chosen by the
engineer. We also replaced flexible brick elements with ALGOR’s
kinematic elements where possible to reduce the analysis computation
time. Kinematic elements behave just
like flexible finite elements, but do not produce stresses. Engineers
can insert kinematic elements in areas of the assembly where dynamic
effects are essential but for which stresses are of secondary
importance. This saves time and the engineer can focus the analysis
on the part of the mechanism being optimized -- a set of bearings
in our case.
After the model size was reduced, my firm defined the analysis
type, unit system, element and material properties by group. A
translator program was used to read in the displacement vs. time
load curves for each actuator element. The program extracted the
load curves for an 11.6-second segment of the motion profile provided
by Iwerks. We chose this particular segment because it contained
the most extreme range of accelerations across all of the load
curves. Material properties for steel and cast iron were defined
using ALGOR’s Material Library Manager. Global analysis parameters
included the duration of the event and capture rate. A rate of
30 captures per second was chosen to match the Iwerks motion file
data points. Gravity also was applied to the model.
During processing, ALGOR’s built-in visualization capabilities
and Monitor utility were activated so we could watch the event
unfold as it was processed. ALGOR enables WYSIWYG visualization
by showing the movement of the mechanism and stresses as they
occur over time. Had we found an error at the beginning or during
the run, we could have stopped the analysis and fixed the problem
without waiting for the entire run to complete. ALGOR’s Monitor
utility works like a virtual oscilloscope, displaying velocity,
displacement, acceleration, reaction forces or maximum stresses
vs. time for a specified node. Using Monitor, we viewed acceleration
vs. time data for the six cylinders.
 |
Created using ALGOR’s Monitor utility, this graph shows
the acceleration vs. time curve for each of the six independently
moving actuator elements used in the Mechanical Event Simulation. |
As soon as the processing was finished, we viewed analysis replays
of the MES in .avi format. These served as visual aids,
helping my firm explain to Iwerks the dynamics of the event in
terms that non-engineers could understand.
 |
A Mechanical Event Simulation (MES) with built-in actuator
element technology of the motion simulator replicated the
movement of computer-controlled hydraulic cylinders. The cylinders
were represented with actuator elements (shown here as blue
lines). Replays of the MES show the cylinders extending and
retracting independently, providing the seat and occupants
with roll, pitch, yaw, heave, surge and sway motion in coordination
with the on-screen adventure action. ALGOR’s actuator elements
(shown here as blue lines) were invented to simulate axial
extension and retraction movement in three-dimensional space,
typical motion for hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders and electric
solenoids. |
The Test
Using ALGOR’s built-in visualization capabilities, we reviewed the
tensor stress output normal to the base of the bearings and axially
through the pivot point for the MES. Tensor stress output was chosen
because of the brittle properties of cast iron; however, von Mises
stress output was used in a general comparison with the linear static
stress analysis to pinpoint timesteps with high relative stresses
in the MES.
The MES results showed that the stresses experienced by the bearings
under loading from the six cylinders were within the acceptable
range. A comparison of the maximum stresses found in the MES with
those of the linear static stress analysis showed the static results
to be very conservative. The accuracy of the MES stress results
for the simulator was important to ensuring that the ride met
the assigned British Fairground Standard.
 |
ALGOR’s Mechanical Event Simulation (MES) software results
showed that the stresses experienced by the bearings were
within the acceptable range. A comparison of the maximum stresses
found in the MES (shown left) with the linear static stress
analysis results (shown prior) showed that the linear static
stress analysis was quite conservative. Much lower loadings
(and therefore stresses) were found in the dynamic analysis
of the MES. As predicted by the MES results, the bearings
performed well in physical testing. |
The actuating motion produced by the MES appeared to be very
realistic when we viewed the analysis replays in real time. However,
to verify the accuracy of the actuator elements used to produce
the motion, we compared the MES output to actual test data. Using
one of the motion bases produced for the Scottish TurboRide, engineers
placed accelerometer test equipment at key areas of the simulator.
One such point was placed in the left rear seat of the motion
base. Data acquisition software compiled the acceleration data
as the motion program was run on the simulator.
Acceleration vs. time data for a node in a similar location as
the accelerometer testing was acquired from the Monitor program.
We found that the MES and physical acceleration testing results
for the same timeframe correlated very well, giving my firm and
Iwerks a high confidence in the accuracy of the results.
 |
The ALGOR Mechanical Event Simulation acceleration vs.
time data for the X, Y and Z directions (right) correlates
well with the acceleration data acquired through laboratory
testing using accelerometers (left). Both sets of data were
captured at similar points in the motion base. |
Through this engineering challenge, Pribonic Engineering and
Consulting has recognized the value of developing virtual prototypes
using ALGOR’s MES. We can represent product designs using detailed
CAD assemblies and simulate complex, dynamic behavior. In this
case, the virtual prototype verified that the ride would withstand
stresses caused by the high-speed actions. Just as importantly,
its true-to-life form will enable it to serve as a virtual prototype
for future product developments by Iwerks.
About the Author
Ed Pribonic is President of Edward M. Pribonic P.E. Engineering
and Consulting, Seal Beach, California. He has over 30 years of
experience in entertainment engineering, including serving as Manager
of Engineering and Architecture at Disneyland and as Senior Design
Manager of Walt Disney Imagineering. He has contributed his expertise
to some of the best-known amusement destinations and attractions
in the country. Past projects include Splash Mountain, Disneyland,
Anaheim, California and Jurassic Park, Universal Studios, Hollywood,
California. He travels frequently, consulting worldwide, and is
presently busy developing a series of permanent magnet brake systems
for roller coasters and other industrial equipment. He is also an
active member of ASTM, AIMS, IAAPA and NAARSO, industry organizations
which develop amusement ride design standards and promote industry
safety. Mr. Pribonic may be contacted by e-mail at pribonic@home.com
or visit his web site at .
|