ELECTRIC MOTOR COMPANY DESIGNS LIGHTER, SAFER
TREADMILL COMPONENT USING FEA SOFTWARE
|
The 42 Frame DC Motor is used primarily in
treadmills. A belt mechanism attached to the motor's shaft
moves the treadmill's walking surface. If the motor's endshield
cover experiences deflection over twelve one-thousandths of
an inch during operation, the endshield cover distortion will
shift the internal rotor assembly and force it to contact
other motor components, which could stop the running motor. |
October 23, 1998, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania -- During peak
exercise times at a fitness facility, a treadmill may run nonstop
for several hours. The electric motor that powers the running
belt must endure daily usage by people of various sizes and fitness
levels. Leeson Electric Corporation designed a lighter, safer
endshield cover for treadmill motors and ensured that it could
withstand at least 40,000 operational hours using finite element
analysis (FEA) software by Algor, Inc.
Leeson Electric Corporation is a leading manufacturer of electric
motors, gear motors and gear boxes. Leeson redesigned its 42 Frame
DC Motor's endshield cover to reduce the part's weight and minimize
deflection during its manufacturing and application processes
using Algor's linear static stress analysis software. The company
then used Accupak/VE Mechanical Event Simulation for Virtual Prototyping
with Linear and Nonlinear Stress Analysis software to verify the
linear analysis results and determine the ranges of stress and
deflection in the endshield cover. Deflection of three ten-thousandths
of an inch can mean the difference between a quiet, long-running
motor and premature failure. Analyzing the endshield cover's deflection
on a computer saved the company time and money by reducing the
number of necessary physical prototype tests.
New DC Motor Endshield Cover Appeals to
Larger Market
The aluminum 42 Frame DC Motor endshield cover is 4.8 inches
in diameter. The two endshield covers on either side of the motor
protect the moving motor parts from the environment and allow
easy access to the motor's brush for service or replacement. The
brush is a component that connects an electrical source to the
rotor assembly. The DC Motor is used primarily in treadmills and
also in lift equipment for disabled persons, gear boxes, refrigeration
systems and pumps.
The redesigned endshield cover is lighter, reducing manufacturing
costs, and meets the safety standard IP21 established by the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in Europe. The IEC's IP21 standard
requires that endshield cover openings be less than 12mm in diameter
to prevent fingers from entering and contacting rotating or electric
current-carrying motor parts. In the United States, larger openings
are acceptable if a motor operates in an enclosed area where contact
with human fingers or other objects is unlikely. Meeting the IEC's
requirement allows Leeson to sell the motor to European manufacturers
that must comply with IEC standards.
|

|
The front and rear endshield covers protect
the motor's rotating components from the environment and fingers
from injury. |
Leeson needed to test the new endshield cover to ensure that it
experienced minimal deflection during its machining process when
it is rotated and shaped on a lathe and during its application as
the motor operates within a moving treadmill. Small deflections
in the endshield cover can cause internal motor components to rub
against each other, leading to wear and premature failure.
Linear Stress Analysis Used to Test and
Optimize New Endshield Cover Design
Aleko Sotiriades, a mechanical engineer with Leeson's Research
and Development Department, first conducted linear stress analyses
of four different rear endshield cover design models to determine
which one experienced the least amount of stress and deflection
under machining and application loads. He did not analyze the
similar front endshield cover because its outer wall that connects
to the motor is shorter than the rear endshield cover's outer
wall. The front endshield cover's outer wall is therefore not
subject to cantilever loads that cause out-of-plane bending stress,
making it inherently stronger than its rear counterpart.
Sotiriades worked with the 3-D solid models from SolidWorks in
Algor and used Algor's Merlin Meshing Technology to create a surface
mesh. Then he refined the surface mesh in critical areas, such
as the bearing bore at the endshield cover's center and areas
where the ribs meet. He used Hexagen, Algor's automatic 3-D solid
brick element mesh engine, to create a solid brick mesh.
He applied the same two sets of loading conditions to all four
models. The first load represented forces during the endshield
cover's machining process when it is rotated and shaped on a lathe.
Four squeezing clamps on the endshield cover's perimeter hold
the part in place on a lathe. If machine operators affix the endshield
cover too tightly to the lathe, the clamps can cause critical
deflection in the bearing bore. The bearing bore surrounds the
shaft hole on the endshield cover's interior. It houses the bearing
that allows free rotation of the motor's flywheel. When the endshield
cover is removed from the lathe, residual deflection must be minimal.
If the bearing bore deflects over three ten-thousandths of an
inch, the bearing inside will misalign with the shaft, leading
to excessive motor noise and premature bearing failure.
Sotiriades then applied loads to all four models that represented
forces during the endshield cover's application. These included
radial forces from belt tension and the motor's rotating flywheel
and axial forces from two bolts that attach the endshield cover
to the motor. The bolts squeeze the parts together and can cause
extreme force if turned too tightly by assembly or maintenance
personnel. If the combined load parameters cause radial deflections
greater than twelve one-thousandths of an inch, the endshield
cover distortion will shift the internal rotor assembly and force
it to contact other motor components, which could stop the running
motor. Leeson designs the endshield cover to withstand four one-thousandths
of an inch to ensure infinite life, guaranteeing its function
beyond the average bearing's 40,000-hour operating life.
Sotiriades optimized the design that experienced the least amount
of stress and deflection and had the lowest mass. He removed excess
weight from the endshield cover's outer wall, still meeting the
minimal deflection requirements. He was able to reduce the endshield
cover's weight by nearly 50 percent. He then verified the linear
results with nonlinear stress analysis software. Nonlinear analysis
uncovered more detailed information about the model's range of
stress and deflection.
"I used linear analysis as a quick, filtering technique to find
the best working shape for the endshield cover," said Sotiriades.
"I then turned to Algor's Accupak/VE Mechanical Event Simulation
software to verify the linear analysis results and provide an
enhanced profile of the endshield cover's stress and deflection.
The presence of minute deflection could be devastating to the
motor, so I wanted to be absolutely sure about the linear analysis
results."
Nonlinear Analysis Verifies Best Endshield
Cover Design
To verify the linear analysis results, Sotiriades used Algor's
Accupak/VE Mechanical Event Simulation for Virtual Prototyping
with Linear and Nonlinear Stress Analysis. He first modeled one-half
of the rear endshield cover to save analysis time testing it under
machining loads. The complete model consisted of nearly 10,000
elements and the loads representing the four squeezing clamps
were symmetrical. He then analyzed a complete model under application
loads.
Sotiriades analyzed the models using the von Mises strain hardening
and von Mises kinematic hardening stress criteria to determine
the minimum and maximum ranges of stress and deflection. He found
that stress did not exceed the material's endurance limit and
deflection values did not exceed those allowable during the endshield
cover's machining and application processes. He used Algor's post-analysis
visualization capabilities to view the analysis results in detail.
|
The nonlinear Algor model of the endshield
cover under loading conditions during the motor's application,
viewed from the inside. The endshield cover experiences radial
forces from belt tension and the motor's rotating flywheel
and axial forces from two bolts that attach the endshield
cover to the motor. The linear and nonlinear analyses found
that the combined load parameters did not cause greater than
the allowable four one-thousandths of an inch of deflection. |
"I appreciate Algor's post-processing capabilities. I can manipulate
my model view to study the analysis results from different perspectives.
And it is easy to create graphics of the model that I can use
for presentations," said Sotiriades.
Keeping Those Motors Running
Leeson manufactured 22 aluminum endshield cover prototypes to
verify that new deflection-causing forces would not arise during
the endshield cover's production and assembly as a result of its
new geometry. The prototypes also confirmed Algor software's analysis
results.
To verify distortion during the machining process, the prototypes
were measured with a visual scanning device, placed on a lathe
and measured again when removed from the lathe to detect deflection.
Some of the prototypes were then tested in actual customer applications
under normal loading conditions for over 10,000 hours, the minimum
life of a treadmill. Leeson tested the remaining prototypes in
its laboratory. To save 7,500 hours of test time, Leeson applied
over twice the normal loading conditions and ran the motor for
2,500 hours.
No prototype failures were reported. The company has sold 22,500
motors with the new endshield cover since it was introduced in
May 1998.
"Virtual prototyping with Algor's Accupak/VE software shortens
the length of the design cycle by reducing the number of required
physical prototype tests," said Sotiriades. "Leeson Electric Corporation
saved time and money optimizing one rear endshield cover design
with finite element analysis software. We only had to verify the
results of the final Algor model of the rear cover with laboratory
tests."
|